4.6 Article

Mitochondrial permeability regulates cardiac endothelial cell necroptosis and cardiac allograft rejection

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 686-698

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15112

关键词

animal models: murine; basic (laboratory) research/science; cell death; cell death: apoptosis; cellular biology; graft survival; heart transplantation/cardiology; immunohistochemistry; molecular biology

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-115048, MOP-111180, TFU-127880]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transplantation is invariably associated with programmed cell death including apoptosis and necrosis, resulting in delayed graft function and organ rejection. We have demonstrated the contribution of necroptosis to mouse microvascular endothelial cell (MVEC) death and transplant rejection. Organ injury results in the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTPs), which can trigger apoptotic molecules release that ultimately results in cell death. The effect of mPTPs in the necroptotic pathway remains controversial; importantly, their role in transplant rejection is not clear. In this study, tumor necrosis factor-alpha triggered MVECs to undergo receptor-interacting protein kinase family (RIPK1/3)-dependent necroptosis. Interestingly, inhibition of mPTP opening could also inhibit necroptotic cell death. Cyclophilin-D (Cyp-D) is a key regulator of the mPTPs. Both inhibition and deficiency of Cyp-D protected MVECs from necroptosis (n = 3, P < .00001). Additionally, inhibition of Cyp-D attenuated RIPK3-downstream mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein phosphorylation. In vivo, Cyp-D-deficient cardiac grafts showed prolonged survival in allogeneic BALB/c mice posttransplant compared with wild-type grafts (n = 7, P < .0001). Our study results suggest that the mPTPs may be important mechanistic mediators of necroptosis in cardiac grafts. There is therapeutic potential in targeting cell death via inhibition of the mPTP-regulating molecule Cyp-D to prevent cardiac graft rejection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据