4.6 Article

Distinct Expression Patterns of Alveolar Alarmins'' in Subtypes of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 1425-1432

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12718

关键词

Bronchiolitis obliterans (BOS); bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL); clinical research/practice; innate immunity; lung transplantation/pulmonology; rejection: chronic

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [190953]
  2. Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [2387]
  3. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation [GL2-01-019]
  4. Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science for Young Scientists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-term success of lung transplantation is limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). The purpose of this study was to investigate the alveolar alarmin profiles in CLAD subtypes, restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were collected from 53 recipients who underwent double lung or heart-lung transplantation, including patients with RAS (n = 10), BOS (n = 18) and No CLAD (n = 25). Protein levels of alarmins such as S100A8, S100A9, 5100A8/A9, S100Al2, S100P, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) in BAL fluid were measured. RAS and BOS showed higher expressions of S100A8, S100A8/A9 and S100Al2 compared with No CLAD (p <0.0001, p <0.0001, p <0.0001 in RAS vs. No CLAD, p = 0.0006, p = 0.0044, p = 0.0086 in BOS vs. No CLAD, respectively). Moreover, RAS showed greater up-regulation of Si 00A9, S100A8/A9, S100Al2, S100P and HMGB1 compared with BOS (p = 0.0094, p = 0.038, p = 0.041, p = 0.035 and p = 0.010, respectively). sRAGE did not show significant difference among the three groups (p = 0.174). Our results demonstrate distinct expression patterns of alveolar alarmins in RAS and BOS, suggesting that RAS and BOS may represent biologically different subtypes. Further refinements in biologic profiling will lead to a better understanding of CLAD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据