4.3 Article

Resistin is an inflammatory marker of inflammatory bowel disease in humans

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f16251

关键词

Crohn's disease; disease activity; inflammatory bowel disease; resistin; ulcerative colitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Resistin, a recently discovered adipokine, has been shown to be associated with inflammatory conditions such as insulin resistance, obesity, atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. We therefore hypothesized that (i) resistin levels may be elevated in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and (ii) resistin levels may be associated with disease activity in IBD. Methods We addressed these questions by testing for associations between resistin plasma levels, inflammatory parameters and clinical disease activity in a case-control study with 235 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), 112 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 144 healthy controls. Results Patients with IBD showed significantly higher resistin levels compared with controls (P<0.0001). In both, patients with CD and LIC, resistin concentrations were significantly associated with elevated white blood cell count (P<0.0001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (P<0.0001) and disease activity (P <= 0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, resistin levels were identified as an independent predictor of active disease (odds ratio 1.014, 95% confidence interval 1.002-1.027, P=0.02) in patients with CD after adjusting for sex, age, body mass index, white blood cell count and CRR In LIC patients, resistin was associated with active disease in multivariate regression analysis after control for sex, age, body mass index and white blood cell count (odds ratio 1.015, 95% confidence interval 1.002-1.029, P=0.02). Addition of CRP, however, abolished this association. Conclusion Resistin levels are an independent predictor of disease activity in patients with CID. Resistin may represent a novel link between inflammation and IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据