4.6 Article

MRSA and VRE Colonization in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 1887-1894

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12784

关键词

-

资金

  1. Warren Alpert School of Brown University
  2. Department of Medicine
  3. Division of Infectious Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) colonization among the increasing number of solid organ transplant patients has not been systematically explored. We searched PubMed and EMBASE for pertinent articles, performed a meta-analysis of prevalence across eligible studies and estimated the risk of ensuing MRSA or VRE infections relative to colonization status. We stratified effects in the pretransplant and posttransplant period. Twenty-three studies were considered eligible. Seventeen out of 23 (74%) referred to liver transplants. Before transplantation, the pooled prevalence estimate for MRSA and VRE was 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-15.8) and 11.9% (95% CI 6.8-18.2), respectively. MRSA estimate was influenced by small studies and was lower (4.0%; 95% CI 0.4-10.2) across large studies (>200 patients). After transplantation, the prevalence estimates were 9.4% (95% CI 3.0-18.5) for MRSA and 16.2% (95% CI 10.7-22.6) for VRE. Pretransplant as well as posttransplant MRSA colonization significantly increased the risk for MRSA infections (pooled risk ratio [RR] 5.51; 95% CI 2.36-12.90 and RR 10.56; 95% CI 5.58-19.95, respectively). Pretransplant and posttransplant VRE colonization were also associated with significant risk of VRE infection (RR 6.65; 95% CI 2.54-17.41 and RR 7.93; 95% CI 2.36-26.67, respectively). Solid organ transplantation is a high-risk setting for MRSA and VRE colonization, and carrier state is associated with infection. Upgraded focus in prevention and eradication strategies is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据