4.6 Article

Kidney Intragraft Donor-Specific Antibodies as Determinant of Antibody-Mediated Lesions and Poor Graft Outcome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 2855-2864

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12438

关键词

Anti-HLA antibodies; antibody-mediated lesions; donor-specific antibodies; graft elution; kidney transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allograft pathology, antibody-tissue interaction as demonstrated by C4d deposition and serological evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are the cardinal diagnostic features of antibody-mediated lesions (AML) in kidney transplantation. However, discrepancy between histological and serological findings is common, and more reliable diagnostic tools are called for. Here, we asked whether the in situ detection of DSA could serve as marker for AML. To that end, we applied the anti-HLA single antigen flow bead assay to eluates from 51 needle core graft biopsies performed for cause. Intragraft antibody profiles were correlated to serum DSA (sDSA), histological data and transplant outcome. The prevalence and the mean number of intragraft DSA (gDSA) were lower than that of sDSA (15/51 gDSA+ vs. 37/51 sDSA+ patients; 1.64 gDSA vs. 2.24 sDSA per patient). DSA were detected in all anti-HLA antibody-positive biopsies (15/15). The presence of gDSA was significantly associated with (1) microcirculation lesions taken individually (g, cg) and analyzed in functional clusters (ptc+g+cg>0, cg+mm>0), (2) C4d positivity and (3) a worse short-term transplant outcome (p=0.05). These associations were not found for patients presenting only sDSA. Taken together, these results indicate that gDSA is a severity marker of antibody-mediated pathogenic process. Utilizing elution of donor-specific HLA-specific antibodies from kidney biopsies from functioning transplants, the authors report that in situ presence of antibodies behaves as a marker of rejection severity and of poor prognosis. See editorial by Sis on page 2790.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据