4.3 Article

Synergistic impacts of heat shock and spawning on the physiology and immune health of Crassostrea gigas:: an explanation for summer mortality in Pacific oysters

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00463.2007

关键词

induced thermotolerance; heat shock proteins; energy trade-offs; metabolic activity; immunocompetence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass mortality is often observed in cultured oysters during the period following spawning in the summer season. To examine the underlying causes leading to this phenomenon, thermotolerance of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas was assessed using pre- and postspawning oysters that were sequentially treated with sublethal (37 degrees C) and lethal heat shocks (44 degrees C). The effects were examined on a range of immune and metabolic parameters in addition to mortality rate. A preventative 37 degrees C significantly reduced oyster mortality after exposure to a second heat shock of 44 degrees C, but in postspawning oysters mortality remained at 80%, compared with < 10% in prespawning oysters. Levels of the 72 kDa and 69 kDa heat shock proteins were low in the gill tissue from postspawning oysters stimulated by heat shock, indicating spawning reduced heat shock protein synthesis. The postspawning oysters had depleted glycogen stores in the mantle tissue and reduced adenylate energy charge after heat shock, indicative of lower energy for metabolic activity. A cumulative effect of spawning and heat shock was observed on the immunocompetence of oysters, demonstrated by reduced hemocyte phagocytosis and hemolymph antimicrobial activity. These results support the hypothesis that the energy expended during reproduction compromises the thermotolerance and immune status of oysters, leaving them easily subject to mortality if heat stress occurs in postspawning stage. This study improves our understanding of oyster summer mortality and has implications for the long-term persistence of mollusks under the influence of global warming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据