4.0 Review

Common pathological processes in Alzheimer disease and type 2 diabetes: A review

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 384-402

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.09.001

关键词

ageing; Alzheimer's; diabetes; neurodegeneration; insulin; growth factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are conditions that affect a large number of people in the industrialized countries. Both conditions are on the increase, and finding novel treatments to cure or prevent them are a major aim in research. Somewhat surprisingly, AD and T2DM share several molecular processes that underlie the respective degenerative developments. This review describes and discusses several of these shared biochemical and physiological pathways. Disturbances in insulin signalling appears to be the main common impairment that affects cell growth and differentiation, cellular repair mechanisms, energy metabolism, and glucose utilization. Insulin not only regulates blood sugar levels but also acts as a growth factor on all cells including neurons in the CNS. impairment of insulin signalling therefore not only affects blood glucose levels but also causes numerous degenerative processes. Other growth factor signalling systems such as insulin growth factors (IGFs) and transforming growth factors (TGFs) also are affected in both conditions. Also, the misfolding of proteins plays an important role in both diseases, as does the aggregation of amyloid peptides and of hyperphosphorylated proteins. Furthermore, more general physiological processes such as angiopathic and cytotoxic developments, the induction of apoptosis, or of non-apoptotic cell death via production of free radicals greatly influence the progression of AD and T2DM. The increase of detailed knowledge of these common physiological processes open up the opportunities for treatments that can prevent or reduce the onset of AD as well as T2DM. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据