4.6 Article

Development of simulated intestinal fluids containing nutrients as transport media in the Caco-2 cell culture model:: Assessment of cell viability, monolayer integrity and transport of a poorly aqueous soluble drug and a substrate of efflux mechanisms

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 32, 期 4-5, 页码 261-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2007.08.002

关键词

Caco-2 cell culture; intestinal absorption; transport medium; simulated intestinal fluid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to identify simulated intestinal fluids (SIFs) containing nutrients compatible with the Caco-2 cell culture model and to examine the impact of the identified medium on the transport of a poorly aqueous soluble model compound, estradiol, and a substrate of efflux mechanisms, etoposide. Monolayer integrity was evaluated by transepithelial electrical resistance and cellular viability by release of lactate dehydrogenase to the apical compartment and cellular protein content. It was shown that the viability of Caco-2 cells was enhanced by use of the CO2 independent nutritional medium, Leibovitz's L-15 compared to Hanks' balanced salt solution. SIF containing 5 mM sodium taurocholate and 1.25 mM phosphatidylcholine or lysophosphatidylcholine in Leibovitz's L-15 induced less release of lactate dehydrogenase than the traditional transport medium, HBSS. Addition of lipolysis products, 0.5 mM oleic acid and 0.25 mM monoolein, did only cause increase in lactate dehydrogenase in 3 of 12 comparisons. The presence of SIFs in the apical compartment was shown to decrease flux of estradiol due to incorporation of estradiol in micelles and hence a decreased fraction of free estradiol. Further, a concentration dependent increase in the apparent permeability of etoposide was observed from apical to basolateral compartment, which indicated that components in the SIFs affects efflux mechanisms. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据