4.2 Article

MCP-1, RANTES, and SDF-1 polymorphisms in Mexican patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 12, 页码 980-985

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2007.10.007

关键词

chemokines; monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; polymorphisms; regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted; stromal cell-derived factor-1; systemic lupus erythematosus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemokines and cytokines play an important role in the inflammatory development and progression of autoimmune diseases. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of MCP-1, SDF-1, and RANTES polymorphisms as susceptibility markers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a group of Mexican patients. MCP-1-2518, SDF-1 G801A, and RANTES-28 polymorphisms were determined in 242 patients with SLE and 220 ethnically matched healthy controls by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. The differences between patients and healthy controls were evaluated by chi(2), Fisher's exact test, and Woolf method for odds ratio. A moderately increased frequency of MCP-1-2518 A allele (p = 0.033, pC = NS) and AA genotype (p = 0.017, PC = NS) existed in SLE patients compared with healthy controls. There was a relationship between polymorphisms and some clinical and laboratory characteristics. SLE patients with and without antiphospholipid syndrome demonstrated different distribution of SDF-1 G801A genotype frequencies. On the other hand, patients with leukopenia, anti-dsDNA, and antiphospholipid autoantibodies demonstrated different MCP-1-2518 genotype distribution compared with patients without these features. Our results suggest that MCP-1 polymorphism is moderately associated with the genetic susceptibility to SLE in Mexican individuals. The polymorphisms could be related to specific clinical and laboratory characteristics in these patients. (C) 2007 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据