4.7 Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to reduce exposure to house dust and their effect on the development and severity of asthma

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
卷 115, 期 12, 页码 1691-1695

出版社

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10382

关键词

asthma; atopy; children; house dust mite; meta-analysis; randomized control trial; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether any household dust reduction intervention has the effect of increasing or decreasing the development or severity of atopic disease. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches on household intervention and atopic disease were conducted in January 2007 in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. No date or language restriction was placed on the literature search. DATA EXRACTION: We included randomized controlled trials comparing asthma outcomes in a household intervention group with either placebo intervention or no intervention. DATA SYSNTHESIS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight recruited antenatally and measured development of atopic disease. Six recruited known atopic individuals and measured disease status change. Meta-analyses on the prevention studies found that the interventions made no difference to the onset of wheeze but made a significant reduction in physician-diagnosed asthma. Meta-analysis of lung function outcomes indicated no improvement due to the interventions but found a reduction in symptom days. Qualitatively, health care was used less in those receiving interventions. However, in one study that compared intervention, placebo, and control arms, the reduction in heath care use was similar in the placebo and intervention arms. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that there is not sufficient evidence to suggest implementing hygiene measures in an attempt to improve outcomes in existing atopic disease, but interventions from birth in those at high risk of atopy are useful in preventing diagnosed asthma but not parental-reported wheeze.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据