4.6 Article

Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Improves Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 3008-3020

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04212.x

关键词

Efficacy; everolimus; liver transplantation; reduced; tacrolimus; withdrawal

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma AG
  2. Astellas
  3. MSD
  4. Roche
  5. Janssen-Cilag
  6. Ipsen
  7. Eumedica
  8. CAF
  9. Novartis
  10. Biotest
  11. BMS
  12. Wyeth
  13. Quark Pharmaceuticals
  14. LifeCycle Pharma
  15. Genzyme/Sanofi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a prospective, multicenter, open-label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at day 30 +/- 5 to (i) everolimus initiation with tacrolimus elimination (TAC Elimination) (ii) everolimus initiation with reduced-exposure tacrolimus (EVR+Reduced TAC) or (iii) standard-exposure tacrolimus (TAC Control). Randomization to TAC Elimination was terminated prematurely due to a higher rate of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR). EVR+Reduced TAC was noninferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint (tBPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplantation): 6.7% versus 9.7% (-3.0%; 95% CI -8.7, 2.6%; p<0.001 for noninferiority [12% margin]). tBPAR occurred in 2.9% of EVR+Reduced TAC patients versus 7.0% of TAC Controls (p = 0.035). The change in adjusted estimated GFR from randomization to month 12 was superior with EVR+Reduced TAC versus TAC Control (difference 8.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 97.5% CI 3.74, 13.27 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p<0.001 for superiority). Drug discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 25.7% of EVR+Reduced TAC and 14.1% of TAC Controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.25, 2.66). Relative risk of serious infections between the EVR+Reduced TAC group versus TAC Controls was 1.76 (95% CI 1.03, 3.00). Everolimus facilitates early tacrolimus minimization with comparable efficacy and superior renal function, compared to a standard tacrolimus exposure regimen 12 months after liver transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据