4.6 Article

Varicella-Zoster Immunization in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Safe and Immunogenic

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 2974-2985

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04273.x

关键词

Child; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; humoral; immunity; immunosuppression; liver transplantation; T-lymphocytes; Varicella zoster virus; vaccination

资金

  1. University Hospitals of Geneva (Fonds de Recherche et Developpement)
  2. University Hospitals of Geneva
  3. Center for Vaccinology and Neonatal Immunology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Varicella can have a severe course in immunosuppressed patients. Although prevention is fundamental, live-attenuated varicella-zoster (VZV) vaccine is not currently recommended in transplant recipients. Our aims were to (1) evaluate VZV immunity in pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients; (2) immunize (two doses) seronegative patients post-LT; (3) monitor vaccine safety, (4) assess B and T cell vaccine responses. All patients followed at the Swiss National Pediatric LT Center were approached and 77/79 (97.5%) were enrolled (median age 7.8 years). Vaccine safety was monitored by standardized diary cards and phone calls. VZV-specific serology and CD4(+) T cells were assessed before and after immunization. Thirty-nine patients (51.1%) were seronegative including 14 children immunized pre-LT. Thirty-six of 39 seronegative patients were immunized post-LT (median 3.0 years post LT). Local (54.8%) and systemic (64.5%) reactions were mild and transient. The frequency of VZV-specific CD4+ T cells and antibody titers increased significantly (respectively from 0.085% to 0.16%, p = 0.04 and 21.0 to 1134.5 IU/L, p < 0.001). All children reached seroprotective titers and 31/32 (97%) patients assessed remained seroprotected at follow-up (median 1.7 years). No breakthrough disease was reported during follow-up (median 4.1 years). Thereby, VZV vaccine appears to be safe, immunogenic and provide protection against disease in pediatric LT patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据