4.4 Article

Genomewide spatial correspondence between nonsynonymous divergence and neutral polymorphism reveals extensive adaptation in drosophila

期刊

GENETICS
卷 177, 期 4, 页码 2083-2099

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.080226

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM028016, 5R01GM077368, GM 28016, R01 GM077368] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of recurrent selective sweeps is a spatially heterogeneous reduction in neutral polymorphism throughout the genome. The pattern of reduction depends oil the selective advantage and recurrence rate of the sweeps. Because many adaptive substitutions responsible for these sweeps also contribute to non-synonymous divergence, the spatial distribution of non-synonymous divergence also reflects the distribution of adaptive substitutions. Thus, the spatial correspondence between neutral polymorphism and non-synonymous divergence may be especially informative about the process of adaptation. Here we study this 1 0 correspondence using genomewide polymorphism data from Drosophila simulans and the divergence between D. simulans and D. melanogaster: Focusing on highly recombining portions of the autosomes, at a spatial scale appropriate to the study of selective sweeps, we find that. neutral polymorphism is both lower and, as measured by a new statistic Qs, less homogeneous where non-synonymous divergence is higher and that the spatial structure of this correlation is best explained by the action of strong recurrent selective sweeps. We introduce a method to infer, from the spatial correspondence between polymorphism and divergence, the rate and selective strength of adaptation. Our results independently confirm a high rate of adaptive substitution (similar to 1/3000 generations) and newly suggest. that many adaptations are of surprisingly great selective effect (similar to 1%), reducing the effective population size by similar to 15% even in highly recombining regions of the genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据