4.6 Article

Enhanced De Novo Alloantibody and Antibody-Mediated Injury in Rhesus Macaques

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 2395-2405

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04074.x

关键词

Anti-CD3 immunotoxin; antibody-media-ted rejection; de novo alloantibodies; kidney transplantation; nonhuman primate model; T cell depletion

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [1U01AI074635]
  2. Yerkes National Primate Center [P51RR-00065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic allograft rejection is a major impediment to long-term transplant success. Humoral immune responses to alloantigens are a growing clinical problem in transplantation, with mounting evidence associating alloantibodies with the development of chronic rejection. Nearly a third of transplant recipients develop de novo antibodies, for which no established therapies are effective at preventing or eliminating, highlighting the need for a nonhuman primate model of antibody-mediated rejection. In this report, we demonstrate that depletion using anti-CD3 immunotoxin (IT) combined with maintenance immunosuppression that included tacrolimus with or without alefacept reliably prolonged renal allograft survival in rhesus monkeys. In these animals, a preferential skewing toward CD4 repopulation and proliferation was observed, particularly with the addition of alefacept. Furthermore, alefacept-treated animals demonstrated increased alloantibody production (100%) and morphologic features of antibody-mediated injury. In vitro, alefacept was found to enhance CD4 effector memory T cell proliferation. In conclusion, alefacept administration after depletion and with tacrolimus promotes a CD4+memory T cell and alloantibody response, with morphologic changes reflecting antibody-mediated allograft injury. Early and consistent de novo alloantibody production with associated histological changes makes this nonhuman primate model an attractive candidate for evaluating targeted therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据