4.6 Article

Long-Term Hepatic Allograft Acceptance Based on CD40 Blockade by ASKP1240 in Nonhuman Primates

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 1740-1754

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04014.x

关键词

ASKP1240; CD40-CD154 costimulation blockade; liver transplantation; monoclonal antibody; nonhuman primates

资金

  1. Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd (Shizuoka, Japan)
  2. Astellas Pharma Inc. (Tsukuba, Japan)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22249048, 23659608] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blockade of the CD40CD154 costimulatory signal is an attractive strategy for immunosuppression and tolerance induction in organ transplantation. Treatment with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) results in potent immunosuppression in nonhuman primates (NHPs). Despite plans for future clinical use, further development of these treatments was halted by complications. As an alternative approach, we have been focusing on the inhibition of the counter receptor, CD40 and have shown that a novel human anti-CD40 mAb, ASKP1240, markedly prolongs renal allograft survival in NHPs, although allografts eventually underwent chronic allograft nephropathy. On the basis of our previous findings that a CD40CD154 costimulation blockade induces tolerance to hepatic, but not cardiac, allografts in rodents, we tested here our hypothesis that a blockade of CD40 by ASKP1240 allows acceptance of hepatic allografts in NHPs. A 2-week ASKP1240 induction treatment prolonged liver allograft survival in NHPs; however, the graft function deteriorated due to chronic rejection. In contrast, a 6-month ASKP1240 maintenance monotherapy efficiently suppressed both cellular and humoral alloimmune responses and prevented rejection on the hepatic allograft. No serious side effects, including thromboembolic complications, were noted in the ASKP1240-treated monkeys. We conclude that CD40 blockade by ASKP1240 would be a desirable immunosuppressant for clinical liver transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据