4.6 Article

Molecular and Clinicopathological Analysis of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Posttransplant Smooth Muscle Tumors

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 1908-1917

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04011.x

关键词

Neoplasms; pathology; transplantation; transcription factors; virus

资金

  1. Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum Transplantation (IFB-Tx, German Federal Ministry of Education) [01EO0802]
  2. German Children's Cancer Fund
  3. IFB-Tx

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)associated posttransplant smooth muscle tumors (PTSMT) are very rare complications. We aimed to provide a clinicopathological characterization which is based on our own case series (n = 5) as well as previously reported PTSMT cases (n = 63). Meta-analysis of PTSMT and molecular analysis of tumor cells from our cohort was performed. Most PTSMT developed in kidney-transplanted patients (n = 41/68, 60%). Liver/transplant liver was the main site of manifestation (n = 38/68, 56%). Tumors occurred after a median interval of 48 months (range 5348) and developed earlier in children than in adults. Most tumors showed no marked cellular atypia, low mitosis rate and no tumor necrosis. Gene expression analysis of 20 EBV-related genes, including two microRNAs, revealed overexpression of MYC (p = 0.0357). Therapy was mainly based on surgical resection or reduced immunosuppression but no significant differences in overall survival were evident. Lower overall survival was associated with multiorgan involvement (n = 33/68, 48.5%) and particularly with intracranial PTSMT manifestation (n = 7/68, 10%; p < 0.02), but not transplant involvement (n = 11/68, 16%). In summary, PTSMT differ from conventional leiomyosarcomas by their lack of marked atypia, unusual sites of involvement and defining EBV association. Surgery and reduced immunosuppression show comparable clinical results and prognosis is associated with intracranial manifestation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据