4.6 Article

Acute Renal Endothelial Injury During Marrow Recovery in a Cohort of Combined Kidney and Bone Marrow Allografts

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 1464-1477

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03572.x

关键词

Bone marrow transplant; engraftment syndrome; renal transplant

资金

  1. NIH/ITN
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [N01-AI-15416]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [N01-AI-15416]
  4. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [N01-AI-15416]
  5. National Institutes of Health [RO1-AI-084074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An idiopathic capillary leak syndrome ('engraftment syndrome') often occurs in recipients of hematopoietic cells, manifested clinically by transient azotemia and sometimes fever and fluid retention. Here, we report the renal pathology in 10 recipients of combined bone marrow and kidney allografts. Nine developed graft dysfunction on day 10-16 and renal biopsies showed marked acute tubular injury, with interstitial edema, hemorrhage and capillary congestion, with little or no interstitial infiltrate (<= 10%) and marked glomerular and peritubular capillary (PTC) endothelial injury and loss by electron microscopy. Two had transient arterial endothelial inflammation; and 2 had C4d deposition. The cells in capillarieswere primarily CD68(+) MPO+ mononuclear cells and CD3(+) CD8(+) T cells, the latter with a high proliferative index (Ki67(+)). B cells (CD20(+)) and CD4(+) T cells were not detectable, and NK cells were rare. XY FISH showed that CD45(+) cells in PTCs were of recipient origin. Optimal treatment remains to be defined; two recovered without additional therapy, six were treated with anti-rejection regimens. Except for one patient, who later developed thrombotic microangiopathy and one with acute humoral rejection, all fully recovered within 2-4 weeks. Graft endothelium is the primary target of this process, attributable to as yet obscure mechanisms, arising during leukocyte recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据