4.6 Article

Polyfunctional Cytomegalovirus-Specific Immunity in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Valganciclovir Prophylaxis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 553-560

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03405.x

关键词

Cytomegalovirus; lung transplantation; valganciclovir

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [KL2RR024127]
  2. American Society of Transplantation Clinical Faculty Development
  3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [SCCOR 1P50-HL084917-01, K24-091140-01]
  4. Duke Translational Medicine Institute
  5. Duke University's CTSA, NCRR/NIH [1 UL1 RR024128-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection after lung transplant. Despite effective antiviral medications to treat CMV, invasive CMV disease contributes to lung allograft dysfunction and worse survival. Efforts to prevent CMV have led to the use of valganciclovir prophylaxis for increasingly longer periods after transplant. A pivotal concern with long-term antiviral prophylaxis is that it may prevent or delay the development of CMV-specific immunity and increase the subsequent risk of late onset disease. To address this issue, we conducted a pilot study to determine if CMV-specific immunity was detectable in lung transplant recipients at risk for CMV while on antiviral prophylaxis. Utilizing polychromatic flow cytometry panels, CMV-specific immunity was determined by peripheral blood CD4 and CD8 T cell expression of cytokines in response to the HLA restricted CMV peptides pp65 and IE-1. We determined CMV seropositive lung transplant recipients on valganciclovir for a median of 6 months from transplant have a detectable polyfunctional CMV-specific T cell response which is comparable to seropositive recipients not on antiviral medications and to healthy seropositive nontransplant controls. Thus, valganciclovir prophylaxis does not appear to impair the development of CMV-specific immunity in lung transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据