4.8 Article

A survey of genetic human cortical gene expression

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 1494-1499

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2007.16

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [G9810900, G0701075] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G9810900, G0701075] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G9810900, G0701075] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [UO1HL084744] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIA NIH HHS [U01 AG016976, AG05128, P30-AG13846, P50 AG16570, AG05144, AG05146, P50 AG05136, P50-AG08671, P50AG05681, AG10161, P30 AG19610] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [MH60451] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39764, U24NS051872] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is widely assumed that genetic differences in gene expression underpin much of the difference among individuals and many of the quantitative traits of interest to geneticists. Despite this, there has been little work on genetic variability in human gene expression and almost none in the human brain, because tools for assessing this genetic variability have not been available. Now, with whole-genome SNP genotyping arrays and whole-transcriptome expression arrays, such experiments have become feasible. We have carried out whole-genome genotyping and expression analysis on a series of 193 neuropathologically normal human brain samples using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 500K Array Set and Illumina HumanRefseq-8 Expression BeadChip platforms. Here we present data showing that 58% of the transcriptome is cortically expressed in at least 5% of our samples and that of these cortically expressed transcripts, 21% have expression profiles that correlate with their genotype. These genetic-expression effects should be useful in determining the underlying biology of associations with common diseases of the human brain and in guiding the analysis of the genomic regions involved in the control of normal gene expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据