4.1 Review

Barrett carcinoma - Diagnosis, screening, surveillance, endoscopic treatment, prevention

期刊

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE
卷 45, 期 12, 页码 1264-1272

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963638

关键词

adenocarcinoma; Barrett's esophagus; screening; surveillance; endoscopic resection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus may also be designated as Barrett's carcinoma as it evolves from Barrett's esophagus. Barrett's esophagus Currently is defined as a columnar metaplasia of the distal esophagus, as identified by endoscopy, that, upon histopathology, is confirmed to contain intestinal metaplasia. A different histological entity of columnar metaplasia of the distal esophagus is cardia-type mucosa which probably preceeds intestinal metaplasia, but lacks goblet cells typical for the latter. The conversion rate from Barrett's esophagus to Barrett's carcinoma amounts to 0.5 to 1% per year. Patients with reflux symptoms should undergo early endoscopy in order to search for Barrett's esophagus (screening). In those cases where Barrett's esophagus is identified, regular endoscopic controls should be scheduled (surveillance). The intervals for this have been defined by recent consented guidelines. The aim is to detect neoplasia early. Neoplasia confined to the epithelium or mucosal layer can mostly be treated by endoscopic resection. The depth of infiltration, as determined by histolopathology of the resected specimen, allows one to estimate the risk of lymph node metastasis, and therefore is crucial for the final judgment as to whether the endoscopic intervention may be considered curative. Individually, the risk of metastasis has to be weighed against the risk of morbidity and mortality conferred by the alternative surgical resection. The rapid increase of the incidence of Barrett's carcinoma in Western countries suggests that life style factors, in particular overweight, having a causal role. Data from interventional trials on prevention are, however, pending.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据