4.6 Article

Antigen-presenting cell population dynamics during murine silicosis

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0099OC

关键词

alveolar macrophage; pulmonary dendritic cell; silica; activation; inflammation

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR17670, P20 RR017670] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-013044, ES-015294, F32 ES013044, R01 ES015294] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [P30 GM103338] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicosis is an occupational lung disease resulting from the inhalation of silica particles over prolonged periods of time, which causes chronic inflammation and progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Alveolar macrophages (AM) are critical effector cells, while less is known about the role and function of pulmonary dendritic cells (DC) in silicosis. We hypothesize that a balance exists between the suppressive nature of AM and the stimulatory capacity of DC to regulate lung immunity, and that this equilibrium may be overcome by silica exposure in vivo. Our results demonstrate that in response to silica exposure, both the percent and absolute number of AM significantly decreased overtime, with a concomitant significant increase in DC. Both AM and DC exhibited cellular activation in response to silica, indicated by increased expression of cell surface markers. In the absence of silica-induced AM apoptosis (TNFR 1/2-null and Gld mice), no change was observed in the percent or absolute number of either cell type. Furthermore, bone marrow-derived DC, but not bone marrow-derived macrophages, migrated from the alveoli into the lung parenchyma in response to silica, resulting in significantly increased numbers of activated T lymphocytes. Collectively, the results demonstrate that AM and DC are distinct antigen-presenting cells within the respiratory tract that respond to silica exposure in vivo in unique ways, with significant implications for immune reactivity of the lung in response to environmental pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据