4.6 Article

In vivo depletion of CD11c+ cells impairs scrapie agent neuroinvasion from the intestine

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 11, 页码 7758-7766

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.11.7758

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/A/00001659, BBS/E/A/00001660, BBS/E/I/00000989] Funding Source: Medline
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/A/00001659, BBS/E/A/00001660] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/A/00001660, BBS/E/I/00000989, BBS/E/A/00001659] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following oral exposure, some transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) agents accumulate first upon follicular dendritic cells (DCs) in the GALT. Studies in mice have shown that TSE agent accumulation in the GALT, in particular the Peyer's patches, is obligatory for the efficient transmission of disease to the brain. However, the mechanism through which TSE agents are initially conveyed from the gut lumen to the GALT is not known. Studies have implicated migratory hemopoietic DCs in this process, but direct demonstration of their involvement in vivo is lacking. In this study, we have investigated the contribution of CD11c(+) DO in scrapie agent neuroinvasion through use of CD11c-diptheria toxin receptor-transgenic mice in which CD11c(+) DCs can be specifically and transiently depleted. Using two distinct scrapie agent strains (ME7 and 139A scrapie agents), we show that when CD11c(+) DCs were transiently depleted in the GALT and spleen before oral exposure, early agent accumulation in these tissues was blocked. In addition, CD11c(+) cell depletion reduced susceptibility to oral scrapie challenge indicating that TSE agent neuroinvasion from the GALT was impaired. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that migratory CD11c(+) DCs play a key role in the translocation of the scrapie agent from the gut lumen to the GALT from which neuroinvasion subsequently occurs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据