4.6 Article

Valganciclovir Dosing According to Body Surface Area and Renal Function in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 636-643

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02528.x

关键词

Cytomegalovirus; ganciclovir; pediatric; prophylaxis; solid organ transplantation; valganciclovir

资金

  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Lt, Basel, Switzerland
  2. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd
  3. Basel Switzerland
  4. Darren Bentley
  5. Casey Lee Ball Foundation
  6. GCRC NIH [M01-RR0865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral valganciclovir is effective prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in adults receiving solid organ transplantation (SOT). However, data in pediatrics are limited. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of valganciclovir oral solution or tablets in 63 pediatric SOT recipients at risk of CMV disease, including 17 recipients <= 2 years old. Patients received up to 100 days' valganciclovir prophylaxis; dosage was calculated using the algorithm: dose (mg) = 7 x body surface area x creatinine clearance (Schwartz method; CrCLS). Ganciclovir pharmacokinetics were described using a population pharmacokinetic approach. Safety endpoints were measured up to week 26. Mean estimated ganciclovir exposures showed no clear relationship to either body size or renal function, indicating that the dosing algorithm adequately accounted for both these variables. Mean ganciclovir exposures, across age groups and organ recipient groups were: kidney 51.8 +/- 11.9 mu g * h/mL; liver 61.7 +/- 29.5 mu g * h/mL; heart 58.0 +/- 21.8 mu g * h/mL. Treatment was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that in adults. Seven serious treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in five patients. Two patients had CMV viremia during treatment but none experienced CMV disease. In conclusion, a valganciclovir-dosing algorithm that adjusted for body surface area and renal function provides ganciclovir exposures similar to those established as safe and effective in adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据