4.6 Article

Effects of Donor Age and Cell Senescence on Kidney Allograft Survival

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 114-123

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02500.x

关键词

Donor age; kidney aging; p16(INK4a) expression; senescence; transplantation

资金

  1. Roche Organ Transplant Research Foundation
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research,
  3. Kidney Foundation of Canada
  4. The Muttart Foundation
  5. The Royal Canadian Legion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The biological processes responsible for somatic cell senescence contribute to organ aging and progression of chronic diseases, and this may contribute to kidney transplant outcomes. We examined the effect of pre-existing donor aging on the performance of kidney transplants, comparing mouse kidney isografts and allografts from old versus young donors. Before transplantation, old kidneys were histologically normal, but displayed an increased expression of senescence marker p16(INK4a). Old allografts at day 7 showed a more rapid emergence of epithelial changes and a further increase in the expression of p16(INK4a). Similar but much milder changes occurred in old isografts. These changes were absent in young allografts at day 7, but emerged by day 21. The expression of p16(INK4a) remained low in young kidney allografts at day 7, but increased with severe rejection at day 21. Isografts from young donors showed no epithelial changes and no increase in p16(INK4a). The measurements of the alloimmune response-infiltrate, cytology, expression of perforin, granzyme B, IFN-gamma and MHC-were not increased in old allografts. Thus, old donor kidneys display abnormal parenchymal susceptibility to transplant stresses and enhanced induction of senescence marker p16(INK4a), but were not more immunogenic. These data are compatible with a key role of somatic cell senescence mechanisms in kidney transplant outcomes by contributing to donor aging, being accelerated by transplant stresses, and imposing limits on the capacity of the tissue to proliferate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据