4.7 Article

High prevalence of carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinases in epidemiologically related and unrelated Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Spain

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 1192-1198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01825.x

关键词

Acinetobacter baumannii; carbapenemase; expression; ISAba1; oxacillinase; resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinases are reported increasingly in Acinetobacter baumannii. This study investigated the role of these beta-lactamases in causing resistance to carbapenems in 83 epidemiologically related and unrelated imipenem-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates. The isolates were also analysed for the presence of ISAba1 in the promoter region of the bla(OXA-51)-like gene in order to investigate the role of ISAba1 in OXA-51 expression. All clinical isolates contained a bla(OXA-51)-like gene, 20% contained a bla(OXA-58)-like gene, and 42% contained a bla(OXA-40)-like gene; bla(OXA-23)-like, bla(IMP) and bla(VIM) genes were not detected in any of the isolates investigated. ISAba1 was found in 24 (82.7%) of 28 pulsetypes, and was located in the promoter region of the bla(OXA-51)-like gene in five (20.8%) of these pulsetypes. Expression of bla(OXA-51) was detected in the five isolates with ISAba1 located in the promoter region, but was not detected in an isogenic imipenem-susceptible A. baumannii isolate that did not have ISAba1 located in the promoter region. It was concluded that there is a high prevalence of oxacillinases with activity against carbapenems among genetically unrelated A. baumannii clinical isolates from Spain, and that concomitant expression of two carbapenemases (OXA-51-like and either OXA-40-like or OXA-58-like) may take place. Insertion of an ISAba1-like element in the promoter of the bla(OXA-51)-like gene promotes the expression of this gene, although this did not seem to play a major role in carbapenem resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据