4.6 Article

Graft and Patient Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients Selected for de novo Steroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 160-168

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02442.x

关键词

Kidney transplantation; steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens; survival analysis

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K24DK062234] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [K24 DK062234, K24 DK062234-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steroid-free regimen is increasingly employed in kidney transplant recipients across transplant centers. However, concern remains because of the unknown impact of such an approach on long-term graft and patient survival. We studied the outcomes of steroid-free immunosuppression in a population-based U.S. cohort of kidney transplant recipients. All adult solitary kidney transplant recipients engrafted between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2006 were stratified according to whether they were selected for a steroid-free or steroid-containing regimen at discharge. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate graft and patient survival. The impact of the practice pattern on steroid use at individual transplant centers was analyzed. Among 95 755 kidney transplant recipients, 17.2% were steroid-free at discharge (n = 16 491). Selection for a steroid-free regimen was associated with reduced risks for graft failure and death at 1 year (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72-0.85, and HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82, respectively, p < 0.0001) and 4 years (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.87, and HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.83, respectively, p < 0.0001). This association was mostly observed at individual centers where less than 65% of recipients were discharged on the steroid-containing regimen. De novo steroid-free immunosuppression as currently practiced in the United States appears to carry no increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes in the intermediate term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据