4.4 Article

Higher tumor to benign ratio of the androgen receptor mRNA expression associates with prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 70, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.010

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES Alteration's of androgen receptor (AR) functions caused by overexpression, amplification, or mutation have been described in a significant Subset of advanced prostate cancer (CaP). Because AR mutations or amplification are rare in early stage CaP, we hypothesized that altered AR expression in prostate tumor cells may provide a prognostic indicator of disease progression. METHODS RNA from laser capture microdissected (LCM) tumor and benign epithelial cells from radical prostatectomy specimens of 115 hormone-naive patients were studied. Expression of AR and GAPDH genes were measured by duplex quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 230 specimens. A ratio of the expression of AR gene, normalized to GAPDH gene expression in the same specimens, was compared in tumor and benign epithelial cells (tumor-to-benign ratio) and correlated with clinicopathologic features. RESULTS Paired t test analysis revealed a 62% lower AR expression in tumor tissue compared with benign tissue (P = 0.0005). However, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of time to PSA recurrence revealed that higher tumor cell associated AR expression (continuous, log-transformed), significantly increases odds of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence (P = 0.0139) when controlling for age at surgery, race, time from diagnosis to surgery, risk stratification, pathologic T stage, Gleason sum, and margin status. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative determination of AR gene expression levels in prostate epithelial cells may be useful for predicting PSA recurrence. This study Supports the accumulating data suggesting that gain of AR function may contribute to CaP progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据