4.2 Article

High-yield expression and purification of isotopically labeled norcoclaurine synthase, a Bet v 1-homologous enzyme, from Thalictrum flavum for NMR studies

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 197-204

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2007.07.010

关键词

norcoclaurine synthase; PR-10 protein family; protein purification; isotope labeling; NMR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enzyme norcoclaurine synthase (NCS) found in the common meadow rue, Thalictrum flavum, and other plants shows sequence homology to members of the class 10 of pathogenesis related (PR 10) proteins that contains allergens such as the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1, the major cherry allergen Pru av 1, and the major apple allergen Mal d 1. The enzyme is involved in the plant's secondary metabolism and is required for the production of bioactive secondary metabolites like morphine. Whereas the physiological function of PR 10 class allergens is still unknown, NCS activity has been studied in detail. Investigation of the structural properties of NCS by NMR spectroscopy can thus not only provide new information concerning the reaction mechanism of the enzyme, but is also expected to help clarify the long standing and heavily debated question on the physiological function as well as the reasons for the allergenic potential of members of this protein family. As the first important step towards the three-dimensional solution structure, we optimized expression of recombinant NCS in Escherichia coli and established an efficient purification protocol yielding high amounts of pure isotopically labeled active enzyme. The identity of NCS was confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and activity of the purified enzyme was determined by an assay detecting the radiolabeled reaction product. Spectroscopic analysis by NMR spectroscopy showed that the protein was properly folded with well defined tertiary structure. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据