4.6 Article

Oxidative stress and severe walking disability among older women

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 120, 期 12, 页码 1084-1089

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.07.028

关键词

aging; disability; oxidative stress; protein carbonyls; walking

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 AG999999] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000722] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [R37 AG019905, N01 AG012112, N01-AG12112, R01 AG027012-03, R01 AG027012] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress has been implicated in sarcopenia and the loss of muscle strength with aging, but the relationship between oxidative stress and decrease in muscle strength and physical performance has not been well characterized. Serum protein carbonyls are markers of oxidative damage to proteins and are caused by oxidative stress. METHODS: Serum protein carbonyls were measured at baseline and compared with a decrease in walking speed and development of severe walking disability ( inability to walk or walking speed < 0.4 m/sec) over 36 months of follow-up in 545 moderately to severely disabled women, aged >= 65 years, living in the community in Baltimore, Maryland ( the Women's Health and Aging Study I). RESULTS: After adjusting for age, body mass index, smoking, and chronic diseases, log e protein carbonyls (nmol/mg) were associated with a decrease in walking speed over 36 months (P=.002). During follow-up, 154 women (28.2%) developed severe walking disability. After adjusting for the same potential confounders, log e protein carbonyls were associated with incident severe walking disability ( hazards ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.98, P=.037). CONCLUSION: High oxidative stress, as indicated by oxidative damage to proteins, is an independent predictor of decrease in walking speed and progression to severe walking disability among older women living in the community. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据