4.4 Article

Prenatal diagnosis of a 9q34.3 microdeletion by array-CGH in a fetus with an apparently balanced translocation

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 1112-1117

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1841

关键词

array-CGH; prenatal diagnosis; 9q34.3 deletion; FISH; chromosome rearrangement

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD24064, P01 HD39420] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Use high-resolution genome analysis to clarify the genomic integrity in a fetus with a cytogenetically balanced translocation t(2;9)(q11.2;q34.3). Methods High resolution molecular cytogenetic analyses including G-banded chromosome analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) were performed on cultured cells, and DNA extracted from chorionic villus sample (CVS), amniotic fluid cells and fetal tissue. In addition, a custom fosmid-based tiling path 9q34.3 microarray with a resolution of 35-40 kb was used for array-CGH. Results GTG-banding analysis showed an apparently balanced de novo translocation between the long arms of chromosomes 2 and 9; t(2;9)(q11.2;q34.3). Array-CGH using a targeted chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) uncovered a submicroscopic deletion of the subtelomeric region of 9q34.3 revealing the unbalanced nature of the rearrangement. These results were confirmed independently by FISH. The deletion was delimited to 2.7 Mb in size using the 9q34.3 fosmid-based tiling path array-CGH. Conclusion Array-CGH is a powerful tool for rapid detection of genomic imbalances associated with microdeletion/duplication syndromes and for the evaluation of de novo apparently balanced translocation to enable high-resolution genomic analysis at the breakpoints. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal rearrangements involving dosage-sensitive genomic regions is an important adjuvant to prenatal care and provides more accurate information for counseling and informed decision making. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据