4.3 Article

The role of complex formation and deleterious mutations for the stability of RNA-Like replicator systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 668-686

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-007-9044-6

关键词

prebiotic evolution; RNA world; complex formation; spatially extended replicator dynamics; mesoscale pattern; traveling wave; stochastic reaction diffusion model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the RNA world hypothesis, RNA(-like) self-replicators are suggested as the central player of prebiotic evolution. However, there is a serious problem in the evolution of complexity in such replicators, i.e., the problem of parasites. Parasites, which are replicated by catalytic replicators (catalysts), but do not replicate the others, can destroy a whole replicator system by exploitation. Recently, a theoretical study underlined complex formation between replicators-an often neglected but realistic process-as a stabilizing factor in a replicator system by demonstrating that complex formation can shift the viable range of diffusion intensity to higher values. In the current study, we extend the previous study of complex formation. Firstly, by investigating a well-mixed replicator system, we establish that complex formation gives parasites an implicit advantage over catalysts, which makes the system significantly more vulnerable to parasites. Secondly, by investigating a spatially extended replicator system, we show that the formation of traveling wave patterns plays a crucial role in the stability of the system against parasites, and that because of this the effect of complex formation is not straightforward; i.e., whether complex formation stabilizes or destabilizes the spatial system is a complex function of other parameters. We give a detailed analysis of the spatial system by considering the pattern dynamics of waves. Furthermore, we investigate the effect of deleterious mutations. Surprisingly, high mutation rates can weaken the exploitation of the catalyst by the parasite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据