4.7 Article

Atherosclerosis is attenuated by limiting superoxide generation in both macrophages and vessel wall cells

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.152629

关键词

adhesion molecules; signal transduction; oxidized lipids; reactive oxygen species; thrombin

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL57352] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective - We previously showed that NAD(P) H oxidase deficiency significantly reduces atherosclerosis in apoE(-/-) mice. The present study was designed to determine the relative contribution of monocyte/macrophage versus vascular wall cell NAD(P) H oxidase to atherogenesis in this model. Methods and Results - Cell-specific NAD(P) H oxidase inhibition was achieved via allogenic, sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Aortic atherosclerosis and superoxide production in apoE(-/-) mice (Control) with functional NAD(P) H oxidase in both monocytes/macrophages and vascular wall cells was compared with that in apoE(-/-) mice with nonfunctional monocyte/macrophage NAD(P) H oxidase (BMO) or nonfunctional vessel wall NAD(P) H oxidase (VWO). A significant decrease in superoxide production and atherosclerotic lesions was observed in BMO and VWO mice compared with control mice. Interestingly, BMO mice had significantly lower plasma oxidized LDL levels compared with control and VWO mice, whereas aortic sections of VWO mice showed decreased expression of cellular adhesion molecules compared with control and BMO mice. NAD(P) H oxidase deficiency also attenuated neointimal hyperplasia and mitogenic protein activation in apoE(-/-) mice after arterial injury. Conclusions - We conclude that (1) both monocyte/macrophages and vessel wall cells play critical roles in atherogenesis; (2) decrease in atherosclerosis results from attenuated superoxide generation in monocyte/macrophages or vessel wall cells; and (3) superoxide generation may impact atherosclerosis, in part, by activating smooth muscle cell mitogenic signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据