3.8 Article

Pre-conceptional Vitamin/Folic Acid Supplementation 2007: The Use of Folic Acid in Combination With a Multivitamin Supplement for the Prevention of Neural Tube Defects and Other Congenital Anomalies

期刊

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 1003-1013

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32685-8

关键词

Folic acid; neural tube defect; prevention; spina bifida; risk reduction; multivitamin; preconception; birth defects

资金

  1. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To provide information regarding the use of folic acid in combination with a multivitamin supplement for the prevention of neural tube defects and other congenital anomalies, so that physicians, midwives, nurses, and other health care workers can assist in the education of women in the pre-conception phase of their health care. Option: Supplementation with folic acid and vitamins is problematic, since 50% of pregnancies are unplanned, and women's health status may not be optimal when they conceive. Outcomes: Folic acid in combination with a multivitamin supplement has been associated with a decrease in specific birth defects. Evidence: Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant English language articles published between 1985 and 2007. The previous Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) Policy Statement of November 1993 and statements from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Canadian College of Medical Geneticists were also reviewed in developing this clinical practice guideline. Values: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Benefits, Harms, and Costs: Promoting the use of folic acid and a multivitamin supplement among women of reproductive age will reduce the incidence of birth defects. The costs are those of daily vitamin supplementation and eating a healthy diet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据