4.7 Article

Gene expression of Na+/H+ exchanger in zebrafish H+-ATPase-rich cells during acclimation to low-Na+ and acidic environments

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 293, 期 6, 页码 C1814-C1823

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00358.2007

关键词

ion uptake; acid-base regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene expression of Na+/H+ exchanger in zebrafish H+-ATPase-rich cells during acclimation to low-Na+ and acidic environments. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C1814-C1823, 2007. First published October 3, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00358.2007. -In mammalian nephrons, most of the Na+ and HCO3- is reabsorbed by proximal tubular cells in which the Na+/H (+) exchanger 3 ( NHE3) is the major player. The roles of NHEs in Na+ uptake/ acid- base regulation in freshwater (FW) fish gills are still being debated. In the present study, functional genomic approaches were used to clone and sequence the full-length cDNAs of the nhe family from zebrafish (Danio rerio). A phylogenetic tree analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences showed that zNHE1-8 are homologous to their mammalian counterparts. By RT- PCR analysis and double/ triple in situ hybridization/immunocytochemistry, only zebrafish NHE3b was expressed in zebrafish gills and was colocalized with V-H+-ATPase but not with Na+-K+-ATPase, indicating that H+-ATPase-rich (HR) cells specifically express NHE3b. A subsequent quantitative RT- PCR analysis demonstrated that acclimation to low- Na (+) FW caused upregulation and downregulation of the expressions of znhe3b and zatp6v0c (H+-ATPase C-subunit), respectively, in gill HR cells, whereas acclimation to acidic FW showed reversed effects on the expressions of these two genes. In conclusion, both NHE3b and H+-ATPase are probably involved in Na (+)uptake/acid-base regulation in zebrafish gills, like mammalian kidneys, but the partitioning of these two transporters may be differentially regulated depending on the environmental situation in which fish are acclimatized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据