4.5 Article

An assessment of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 1459-1462

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0334-7

关键词

rectal fistula; incidence; epidemiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In spite of its long history, fistula-in-ano is generally considered to be relatively uncommon. Nevertheless, no comprehensive analysis of its incidence in developed countries is available. Our goal was to determine the actual incidence of fistula-in-ano based on the study of incidence in four countries of the European Union (EU). Materials and Methods We performed a search of hospital inpatient databases in five different countries. We obtained valid data from four European countries, namely, England (UK; Hospital Episodes Statistics), Germany (German hospitals' databases), Italy (Scheda di Dimissione Ospedaliera), and Spain (Conjunto Minimo Basico de Datos by Insalud-Spanish National Health Institute). Results The incidence of fistula-in-ano varied among the different populations in the EU. In the four countries examined, it ranged from 1.04 per 10,000/year in Spain to 2.32 per 10,000/year in Italy. A statistical comparison of rates from the different countries studied gives a confidence interval from 1.20 up to 2.80. The population that we studied represents almost 51% of the total population of the EU. Conclusions This study attempts to determine the actual incidence of fistula-in-ano in the European Community, which was previously uncertain despite its major negative effects on quality of life and the high cost of treatment. Our findings indicate that the incidence of fistula-in-ano in the four countries of the EU studied is significantly higher than that in the only previously published report of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in Europe. Nevertheless, our findings confirm the general perception that fistula-in-ano is a relatively uncommon disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据