4.7 Article

Phytochemical profiling and phase II enzyme-inducing properties of Thunbergia laurifolia Lindl. (RC) extracts

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 114, 期 3, 页码 300-306

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.08.015

关键词

phenolic acids; NQO1; antimutagenicity; flavonoids; rang chuet; HPLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thunbergia laurifolia Lindl. (Acanthaceae) or Rang Chuet (RC) is described in traditional medicine for protection against dietary and environmental toxicants. This work, therefore, investigated RC's phytochemical profile, antimutagenic activity, and xenobiotic detoxification potential in its extracts. RC extracts were prepared by infusion with water, ethanol, acetone and subsequently assayed for major phytochemical constituents. Total phenolic content was 24.33, 5.65, and 1.42 mu g gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per mL for water, ethanol and acetone extract, respectively. HPLC analysis identified caffeic acid and apigenin as primary constituents of water extracts. Acetone and ethanol extracts contained primarily chlorophyll a and b, pheophorbide a, pheophytin a, and lutein. Treatment of Hepa 1C1C7 cells with standardized RC extracts resulted in a dose-dependent increase in QR specific activity for all extracts. Acetone extract (92 mu g GAE/mL) increased QR activity 2.8-fold, while ethanol (120 mu g GAE/mL) and water (1000 mu g GAE/mL) extracts increased QR activity by 1.35- and 1.56-fold, respectively. The RC extracts were subsequently assayed for mutagen and antimutagenic activity by bacterial reverse mutagenesis assay. All three RC extracts exhibited strong dose-dependent antimutagenic activity inhibiting 2-aminoanthracene induced mutagenesis up to 87% in Salmonella typhimurium TA 98. These results support the traditional medicinal use of RC for detoxification and suggest the potential role of both phenolic acids and natural chlorophyll constituents in modulating these effects. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据