4.6 Article

Excited-state structure and dynamics of cis- and trans-azobenzene from resonance Raman intensity analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 111, 期 48, 页码 12072-12080

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp0751460

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resonance Raman intensity analysis was used to investigate the initial excited-state nuclear dynamics of cis- and trans-azobenzene following S, (n pi*) excitation, and fluorescence quantum yield measurements were used to estimate the excited-state lifetimes. trans-Azobenzene exhibits the strongest Raman intensities in its skeletal stretching and bending modes, while torsional motions dominate the nuclear relaxation of cis-azobenzene as indicated by intense Raman lines at 275, 542, 594, and 778 cm(-1). The very weak fluorescence quantum yield for cis-azobenzene is consistent with its similar to 100 fs electronic lifetime while trans-azobenzene, with a fluorescence quantum yield of 1.1 x 10(-5), has an estimated S, lifetime of similar to 3 ps. The absorption and Raman cross-sections of both isomers were modeled to produce a harmonic displaced excited-state potential energy surface model revealing the initial nuclear motions on the reactive surface, as well as values for the homogeneous and inhomogeneous linewidths. For cis-azobenzene, this modeling predicts slopes on the S, potential energy surface that when extrapolated to the position of the harmonic minimum give excited-state changes of similar to 6-20 degrees in the CNNC torsion angle and a <= 3 degrees change in the CNN bending angle. The relatively large excited-state displacements along these torsional degrees of freedom provide the driving force for ultrafast isomerization. In contrast, the excited-state geometry changes of trans-azobenzene are primarily focused on the CNN bend and CN and NN stretches. These results support the idea that cis-azobenzene isomerizes rapidly via rotation about the NN bond, while isomerization proceeds via inversion for trans-azobenzene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据