4.7 Article

Altered heart rate and Sinoatrial node function in mice lacking the cAMP regulator phosphoinositide 3-kinase-γ

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 101, 期 12, 页码 1274-1282

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.158428

关键词

ion channels; electrophysiology; action potentials; arrhythmia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ablation of the enzyme phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) gamma ( PI3K gamma(-/-)) in mice increases cardiac contractility by elevating intracellular cAMP and enhancing sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ handling. Because cAMP is a critical determinant of heart rate, we investigated whether heart rate is altered in mice lacking PBK gamma. Heart rate was similar in anesthetized PI3K gamma(-/-) and wild-type (PI3K gamma(-/-)) mice. However, IP injection of atropine ( 1 mg/kg), propranolol ( 1 mg/ kg), or both drugs in combination unmasked elevated heart rates in PI3K gamma(-/-) mice, suggesting altered sinoatrial node (SAN) function. Indeed, spontaneous action potential frequency was approximate to 35% greater in SAN myocytes isolated from PI3K gamma(-/-) mice compared with PI3K gamma(-/-) mice. These differences in action potential frequency were abolished by intracellular dialysis with the cAMP/protein kinase A antagonist Rp-cAMP but were unaffected by treatment with ryanodine to inhibit sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release. Voltage-clamp experiments demonstrated that elevated action potential frequencies in PI3K gamma(-/-) SAN myocytes were more strongly associated with cAMP-dependent increases in L-type Ca2+ current (I-Ca,I- L) than elevated hyperpolarization- activated current ( If). In contrast, ICa, L was not increased in working atrial myocytes, suggesting distinct subcellular regulation of L-type Ca2+ channels by PI3K gamma in the SAN compared with the working myocardium. In summary, PI3K gamma regulates heart rate by the cAMP-dependent modulation of SAN function. The effects of PI3K gamma ablation in the SAN are unique from those in the working myocardium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据