4.6 Article

Targeted expression of GLI1 in the mammary gland disrupts pregnancy-induced maturation and causes lactation failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 282, 期 49, 页码 36090-36101

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M704280200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U01 CA105491] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR47898] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Hedgehog signaling pathway regulates the development and function of numerous tissues and when mis-regulated causes tumorigenesis. To assess the role of a deregulated Hedgehog signaling pathway in the mammary gland we targeted the expression of the Hedgehog effector protein, GLI1, to mammary epithelial cells using a bigenic inducible system. A constitutively active Hedgehog signaling pathway resulted with 100% penetrance in an undifferentiated mammary lobuloalveolar network during pregnancy. GLI1-expressing transgenic females were unable to lactate and milk protein gene expression was essentially absent. The inability to lactate was permanent and independent of continued GLI1 transgene expression. An increased expression of the GLI1 response gene Snail coupled to reduced expression of E-cadherin and STAT5 in the transgenic mammary gland provides a likely molecular explanation, underlying the observed phenotypic changes. In addition, remodeling of the mammary gland after parturition was impaired and expression of GLI1 was associated with accumulation of cellular debris in the mammary ducts during involution, indicating a defect in the clearance of dead cells. Areas with highly proliferative epithelial cells were observed in mammary glands with induced expression of GLI1. Within such areas an increased frequency of cells expressing nuclear Cyclin D1 was observed. Taken together the data support the notion that correct regulation of Hedgehog signaling within the epithelial cell compartment is critical for pregnancy-induced mammary gland development and remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据