4.0 Article

Physical activity recommendations and decreased risk of mortality

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 167, 期 22, 页码 2453-2460

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.22.2453

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Whether national physical activity recommendations are related to mortality benefit is incompletely understood. Methods: We prospectively examined physical activity guidelines in relation to mortality among 252 925 women and men aged 50 to 71 years in the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study. Physical activity was assessed using 2 self-administered baseline questionnaires. Results: During 1 265 347 person-years of follow-up, 7900 participants died. Compared with being inactive, achievement of activity levels that approximate the recommendations for moderate activity ( at least 30 minutes on most days of the week) or vigorous exercise ( at least 20 minutes 3 times per week) was associated with a 27% ( relative risk [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [ CI], 0.68-0.78) and 32% ( RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64-0.73) decreased mortality risk, respectively. Physical activity reflective of meeting both recommendations was related to substantially decreased mortality risk overall ( RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.46-0.54) and in subgroups, including smokers ( RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.44-0.53) and nonsmokers ( RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.45-0.64), normal weight ( RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.39-0.52) and overweight or obese individuals ( RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.44-0.54), and those with 2 h/d ( RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.63) and more than 2 h/d of television or video watching ( RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.45-0.55). Engaging in physical activity at less than recommended levels was also related to reduced mortality risk ( RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86). Conclusions: Following physical activity guidelines is associated with lower risk of death. Mortality benefit may also be achieved by engaging in less than recommended activity levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据