4.7 Article

The Santa Fe light cone simulation project. I. Confusion and the warm-hot intergalactic medium in upcoming Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect surveys

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 671, 期 1, 页码 27-39

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/522912

关键词

cosmic microwave background; cosmology : observations; cosmology : theory; galaxies : clusters : general; hydrodynamics; methods : numerical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first results from a new generation of simulated large sky coverage (similar to 100 deg(2)) Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (SZE) cluster surveys using the cosmological adaptive mesh refinement N-body/hydro code Enzo. We have simulated a very large (5123 h(-3) Mpc(3)) volume with unprecedented dynamic range. We have generated simulated light cones to match the resolution and sensitivity of current and future SZE instruments. Unlike many previous studies of this type, our simulation includes unbound gas, where an appreciable fraction of the baryons in the universe reside. We have found that cluster line-of-sight overlap may be a significant issue in upcoming single-dish SZE surveys. Smaller beam surveys (similar to 1') have more than one massive cluster within a beam diameter 5%-10% of the time, and a larger beam experiment like Planck has multiple clusters per beam 60% of the time. We explore the contribution of unresolved halos and unbound gas to the SZE signature at the maximum decrement. We find that there is a contribution from gas outside clusters of similar to 16% per object, on average, for upcoming surveys. This adds both bias and scatter to the deduced value of the integrated SZE, increasing difficulty in accurately calibrating a cluster Y-M relationship. Finally, we find that in images where objects with M > 5 x 10(13) M-circle dot have had their SZE signatures removed, roughly a third of the total SZE flux remains. This gas exists at least partially in the warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) and will possibly be detectable with the upcoming generation of SZE surveys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据