4.6 Article

Analysis of single rock blocks for general failure modes under conservative and non-conservative forces

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nag.608

关键词

block stability; flutter; block theory; discontinuum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After describing the kinematics of a generic rigid block subjected to large rotations and displacements, the Udwadia's General Principle of Mechanics is applied to the dynamics of a rigid block with frictional constraints to show that the reaction forces and moments are indeterminate. Thus, the paper presents an incremental-iterative algorithm for analysing general failure modes of rock blocks subject to generic forces, including non-conservative forces such as water forces. Consistent stiffness matrices have been developed that fully exploit the quadratic convergence of the adopted Newton-Raphson iterative scheme. The algorithm takes into account large block displacements and rotations, which together with non-conservative forces make the stiffness matrix non-symmetric. Also included in the algorithm are in situ stress and fracture dilatancy, which introduces non-symmetric rank-one modifications to the stiffness matrix. Progressive failure is captured by the algorithm, which has proven capable of detecting numerically challenging failure modes, such as rotations about only one point. Failure modes may originate from a limit point or from dynamic instability (divergence or flutter); equilibrium paths emanating from bifurcation points are followed by the algorithm. The algorithm identifies both static and dynamic failure modes. The calculation of the factor of safety comes with no overhead. Examples show that the equilibrium path of a rock block that undergoes slumping failure must first pass through a bifurcation point, unless the block is laterally constrained. Rock blocks subjected to water forces (or other non-conservative forces) may undergo flutter failure before reaching a limit point. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据