4.7 Article

Tonic endovanilloid facilitation of glutamate release in brainstem descending antinociceptive pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 50, 页码 13739-13749

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3258-07.2007

关键词

TRPV1; pain; glutamate; periaqueductal gray; descending pathway; endovanilloid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) channels in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) activates OFF antinociceptive neurons of the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). We examined in rats the effect of intra-ventrolateral (VL)-PAG injections of TRPV1 agonists and antagonists on the nocifensive response to heat in the plantar test, neurotransmitter ( glutamate and GABA) release in the RVM, and spontaneous and tail flick-related activities of RVM neurons. The localization of TRPV1 in VL-PAG and RVM neurons was examined using various markers of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. Intra-VL-PAG injection of capsaicin increased the threshold of thermal pain sensitivity, whereas the selective TRPV1 antagonist 5'-iodo-resiniferatoxin (I-RTX) facilitated nociceptive responses, and blocked capsaicin analgesic effect at a dose inactive per se. Intra-VLPAG capsaicin evoked a robust release of glutamate in RVM microdialysates. I-RTX, at a dose inactive per se, blocked the effect of capsaicin, and inhibited glutamate release at a higher dose. Antinociception and hyperalgesia induced by capsaicin and I-RTX, respectively, correlated with enhanced or reduced activity of RVM OFF cells. Immunohistochemical analyses suggested that several TRPV1-immunoreactive (ir) neurons in both the VL-PAG and RVM are glutamatergic and surrounded by glutamatergic and GABAergic terminals. Our data suggest that VL-PAG neurons respond to TRPV1 stimulation by releasing glutamate into the RVM, thereby activating OFF cells and producing analgesia. The results obtained with the TRPV1 antagonist alone suggest that this pathway is tonically activated by endovanilloids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据