4.8 Article

The role of selection pressure in RNA-mediated evolutionary materials synthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 129, 期 49, 页码 15340-15346

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja076054r

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evolutionary materials synthesis is a provocative concept that has the potential for the discovery of novel compounds ranging from drugs to inorganic materials. RNA-mediated evolutionary materials synthesis requires aqueous solvent of moderate ionic strength, water-soluble precursors, and an appropriately designed selection pressure. Throughout the selection process, the RNA must be folded, stable, and accessible once it has bound to a target, catalyzed a chemical reaction, or templated formation of a structure. Subsequently, the RNA must be accessible to permit reverse transcriptase to create DNA copies for amplification. A well-designed selection will generate RNAs that can favor growth of a particular crystal habit or catalyze a specific reaction pathway. In this study we rigorously test the assumptions, procedures, and results of the only published example of an RNA-mediated evolutionary materials synthesis. The proof that a particular RNA sequence is responsible for a novel material synthesis must be established by control experiments as outlined in the present study. Furthermore, the product of nanoscale synthesis must be studied using state-of-the-art characterization methods to determine that selection pressure is exerted according to design. Herein, we demonstrate the use of advanced electron microscopy to determine chemical composition and structure as a critical step in analysis of the success of a selection. We conclude that RNA selections should not be carried out in binary Solvent systems, such as tetrahydrofuran (THF) and water. A specific example, which is not consistent with rigorous selection of functional RNAs or RNA cognates, is provided by the precipitation of the water-insoluble precursor, tris(dibenzylideneacetone) dipalladium(0) Pd-2(DBA)(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据