4.6 Article

Determining the energy gap between the cis and trans isomers of HO3- using geometry optimization within the anti-hermitian contracted schrodinger and coupled cluster methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 111, 期 49, 页码 12635-12640

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp076097u

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cis and trans isomers of the HO3- anion, which are important in proposed mechanisms for ozonization, are studied computationally. Relative energies, geometries, and normal-mode frequencies are calculated with anti-Hermitian contracted Schrodinger equation (ACSE) and coupled cluster methods. Both the ACSE method and the coupled cluster method with single and double excitations (CCSD) are applied in a correlation-consistent polarized double-xi basis set (cc-pVDZ). Using coupled cluster with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)), we treat the problem with larger basis sets than those in previous work, including correlation-consistent polarized quadruple-xi basis sets with (aug-cc-pVQZ) and without (cc-pVQZ) diffuse functions, which permit extrapolation of the cis and trans energies to the complete-basis-set limit. The cis isomer is found to be lower in energy than the trans isomer by -3.5 kcal/mol, which is 50% larger in magnitude than the best previous result of -2.2 kcal/mol. The bond lengths between the 02 and OH fragments of the cis- and trans-HO3 are calculated to be 1.713 and 1.857 angstrom, respectively, where. both bond lengths are significantly longer than the 1.464 angstrom O-O bond in hydrogen peroxide. In this paper, we extend the ACSE method [Mazziotti, D. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 184101], which computes the two-electron reduced density matrix directly, to include geometry optimization by a Newton's method with numerical derivatives. Calculation of the cis and trans-HO3- isomers by the ACSE yields energies, geometries, and frequencies that are closer to those from CCSD(T) than those from CCSD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据