4.6 Article

Tumour-localizing and -photo sensitising properties of meso-tetra(4-nido-carboranylphenyl)porphyrin (H2TCP)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2007.09.012

关键词

photodynamic therapy; boron neutron capture therapy; porphyrin; carborane; melanotic melanoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A water-soluble meso-substituted porphyrin (H2TCP) bearing 36 boron atoms, which appeared to be an efficient photodynamic sensitiser (singlet oxygen quantum yield=0.44), was studied for its accumulation by murine melanotic melanoma cells (B16F1). The amount of H2TCP in the cells increased with the porphyrin dose in the incubation medium up to, and at least, 100 mu M concentrations with no significant cytotoxic effect in the dark. Moreover, the H2TCP uptake increased with the incubation time reaching a plateau value corresponding with the recovery of 0.4 nmol of H2TCP per mg of cell proteins after 24 h incubation. Fluorescence microscopy observations showed that the porphyrin was largely localized intracellularly, exhibiting a discrete distribution in the cytoplasm with a pattern which was closely similar to that observed for the endosomal probe Lucifer yellow. The photosensitising efficiency of the H2TCP toward B16F1 cells was studied for different irradiation (1-15 min) and incubation (1-24 h) times. Nearly complete (> 95%) cell mortality was obtained upon incubation with 20 mu M H2TCP and 10 min irradiation with red light (600-700 nm, 20 mW/cm(2)). The porphyrin was also accumulated in appreciable amounts by the tumour tissue after intravenous injection to C57BL/6 mice bearing a subcutaneously transplanted melanotic melanoma. Maximum accumulation in the turnout was achieved by administration of H2TCP dissolved in the ternary mixture 20% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)-30% polyethyleneglycol (PEG 400)-50% water. Thus, this porphyrin could act as both a photodynamic therapy agent and a radiosensitising agent for boron neutron capture therapy. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据