4.5 Article

PHOX2B Immunolabeling A Novel Tool for the Diagnosis of Undifferentiated Neuroblastomas Among Childhood Small Round Blue-cell Tumors

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1141-1149

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31825a6895

关键词

pediatric neoplasms; undifferentiated neuroblastoma; peripheral neuroblastic tumors; small round blue-cell tumor; PHOX2B

资金

  1. la Ligue contre le Cancer
  2. associations Les Bagouz a Manon, Hubert Gouin, and La Hulotte
  3. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique [PHRC2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripheral neuroblastic tumors are the most commonly occurring extracranial tumors in children. Although a reliable diagnosis is achievable in the majority of cases, diagnosis of a minority of peripheral neuroblastic tumor cases (especially undifferentiated neuroblastoma) poses a challenge compared with that of other pediatric small round blue-cell tumors. A panel of immunohistochemical markers and fusion transcripts is available for the diagnosis of such tumors, but the markers for neuroblastoma lack specificity and sensitivity. As the transcription factor PHOX2B is highly specific for the peripheral autonomic nervous system from which peripheral neuroblastic tumors are derived, we have assessed PHOX2B immunolabeling as a diagnostic tool in pediatric small round blue-cell tumors. We observed PHOX2B expression in all peripheral neuroblastic tumors, paragangliomas, and pheochromocytomas tested but in no other pediatric tumors among the 388 cases studied by expression microarray and the 109 cases studied by immunohistochemical analysis. We then assessed the results of PHOX2B immunohistochemistry in 12 cases of undifferentiated pediatric neoplasms: PHOX2B was expressed in 6/6 undifferentiated neuroblastomas and in no other small round blue-cell tumors. Finally, we showed that PHOX2B immunohistochemical analysis improves the diagnosis of undifferentiated neuroblastoma with high specificity and sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据