4.7 Article

Relationship between mobility factors (Rf) of two hydrophobic termiticides and selected field and artificial soil parameters

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 388, 期 1-3, 页码 206-213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.08.006

关键词

chlorpyrifos; fenvalerate; soil TLC; soil properties; artificial soils

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobility of two commonly used hydrophobic termiticides, chlorpyrifos and fenvalerate, was carried out by soil thin layer chromatograph using 3 field soils and 7 artificial soil as absorbent phases. Mobility factors (R-f) were measured, and single- and multi-variable linear regression equations were then established. The result indicated that chlorpyrifos removed faster than fenvalerate in both field and artificial soils. In field soils negative correlation coefficients (r) was found between R-f and organic matter (OM) content, pH, cationic exchange capacity (CEC) and clay content. It was noticeable, however, that correlation coefficient (r) derived from single-variable equations were not a reliable criterion for evaluation of relative importance of individual soil parameter in R-f determination. One could see, in multi-variable regression, a functional superposition of OM and CEC in pesticide/soil interaction, and the influence of soil pH was overwhelmed by joint action of the other 3 parameters. R-f of the two hydrophobic termiticides could therefore be predicted with adequate accuracy by either of the combinations of the two parameter: 1) OM content and clay content, 2) CEC and clay content. Introducing field soil properties into equations established from artificial soils one could see that the four-variable equations, which toke sphagnum as the only source of CEC, gave better prediction of field soil R-f. In spite of that these equations were different in two points with those from field soils: Firstly the parameter of soil pH could not be deprived, and secondly, R-f of chlorpyrifos was positively correlated with the level of clay content. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据