4.6 Article

Leishmania mexicana infection induces impaired lymph node expansion and Th1 cell differentiation despite normal T cell proliferation

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 12, 页码 8200-8207

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.12.8200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI35914] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leishmania mexicana infections in C57BL/6 mice are associated with minimal immune responses and persistent cutaneous lesions. in contrast, Leishmania major elicits a robust Th1 response that promotes lesion resolution. We investigated whether the non-healing phenotype associated with L. mexicana was due to a failure of L. mexicana to activate T cells. In vivo T cell responses to infection were assessed by tracking the behavior of labeled naive T cells following the transfer of these cells into congenic mice. Although L. mexicana infection was associated with minimal expansion of the draining lymph nodes, we observed no difference in the percentage of T cells proliferating in response to L. mexicana and L. major. Instead, differences in the size and cellularity of lymph nodes were associated with decreased recruitment of cells trafficking to the lymph node. Furthermore, we found that T cells responding to L. mexicana infection were less able to differentiate into IFN-gamma producing cells, and this deficit extended to previously activated T cells as well. Coadministration of CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides at the time of infection overcame this deficit and promoted disease resolution. Taken together, our results identify two distinct components that contribute to the minimal immune response associated with L. mexicana infection. First, despite ample levels of T cell proliferation, L. mexicana fails to induce substantial lymph node expansion, which limits the number of responding T cells. Second, L. mexicana infection fails to drive the differentiation of the majority of responding cells into IFN-gamma producers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据