4.7 Article

Spectropolarimetry of the type IIb supernova 2001ig1

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 671, 期 2, 页码 1944-1958

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/523261

关键词

supernovae : general; supernovae : individual (SN 2001ig); techniques : polarimetric

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present spectropolarimetric observations of the Type IIb SN 2001ig in NGC 7424; conducted with the ESO VLT FORS1 on 2001 December 16, 2002 January 3, and 2002 August 16, or 13, 31, and 256 days postexplosion. These observations are at three different stages of the SN evolution: (1) the hydrogen-rich photospheric phase, (2) the Type II to Type Ib transitional phase, and (3) the nebular phase. At each of these stages, the observations show remarkably different polarization properties as a function of wavelength. We show that the degree of interstellar polarization is 0.17%. The low intrinsic polarization (similar to 0.2%) at the first epoch is consistent with an almost spherical (<10% deviation from spherical symmetry) hydrogen-dominated ejecta. Similar to SN 1987A and to Type IIP SNe, a sharp increase in the degree of the polarization (similar to 1%) is observed when the outer hydrogen layer becomes optically thin by day 31; only at this epoch is the polarization well described by a dominant axis.'' The polarization angle of the data shows a rotation through similar to 40 degrees between the first and second epochs, indicating that the asymmetries of the first epoch were not directly coupled with those observed at the second epoch. For the most polarized lines, we observe wavelength-dependent loop structures in addition to the dominant axis on the Q-U plane. We show that the polarization properties of Type IIb SNe are roughly similar to one another, but with significant differences arising due to line blending effects especially with the high velocities observed for SN 2001ig. This suggests that the geometry of SN 2001ig is related to SN 1993J and that these events may have arisen from a similar binary progenitor system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据